Estimating asbestos content of bulk samples
Quantitation of asbestos content in bulk materials continues to present difficulties to laboratories. Methods of quantitation commonly used by laboratories include volume estimation using the simple stereomicroscope, visual area estimation from slide mounts, and area estimation by point counting of slide mounts. Each of these methods may present problems that preclude obtaining accurate results. If values are to be given in weight percent, results obtained by volume estimation may be in error if significant differences in specific gravities of the asbestos and binder/matrix material are not considered. Quantitation by area estimation, visually or by point counting, must take into account not only differences in the specific gravities of the asbestos and binder/matrix, but also significant differences in the thicknesses of the asbestos particles as compared to the binder/matrix particles if results are to be expressed as weight percent. Large variations in particle thickness may cause significant bias because area estimates are comparisons of projected areas and not volumes of the sample components. It is suggested that calibration standards comprised of a variety of asbestos types and concentrations, mixed with a variety of common binder/matrix materials, be prepared for "in-house" calibration of microscopists.
Perkins, R., & Beard, M. (1991). Estimating asbestos content of bulk samples. National Asbestos Council Journal, 9(1), 27-31.