RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Non-membrane solvent extraction desalination (SED) technology using solubility-switchable amine
Choi, O. K., Seo, J. H., Kim, G. S., Hendren, Z., Kim, G. D., Kim, D., & Lee, J. W. (2021). Non-membrane solvent extraction desalination (SED) technology using solubility-switchable amine. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 403, Article 123636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123636
Solvent extraction desalination (SED) is one of the liquid-liquid separation techniques that selectively uptake freshwater from high saline water, and then separate the absorbed freshwater from the solvent through temperature swing. This study evaluated the desalination performance of seven different amine solvents. Among these solvents, dipropylamine (DPA) was selected as the best solvent for SED, with higher potential of water recovery and salt removal efficiency in batch screening experiment. A continuous SED process was operated using DPA as the solvent, and its desalination performance, i.e. water recovery and salt removal efficiency, was investigated under varied retention time, mixing intensity, and separation temperature. Increase in mixing time, mixing intensity, and separation temperature led to better efficiency of water recovery. On the other hand, salt removal efficiency tended to depend on the inherent characteristics of the solvent, rather than the operating conditions. When the retention time, mixing intensity, and separation temperature were 30 min, 600 rpm, and 80 °C, respectively, the continuous SED process showed 11.05% of water recovery, and 95.5% of salt removal efficiency. Under these conditions, the total thermal energy consumption was estimated at 5.0-6.9 kW h/m3, which is significantly lower than the evaporation process 14.1-27.3 kW h/m3, and comparable to the membrane process 4.0-6.0 kW h/m3.
RTI shares its evidence-based research - through peer-reviewed publications and media - to ensure that it is accessible for others to build on, in line with our mission and scientific standards.