Several recent studies in low-resource countries have claimed that training in and increased use of-newborn resuscitation resulted in reduced stillbirth rates. In the present article, we explore the ability of various types of birth attendant in some low-resource country locations to gather data that accurately differentiate a stillbirth from a live birth/early neonatal death. We conclude that, in many situations, it cannot be determined whether the infant was a stillbirth or a live birth/early neonatal death, and therefore the least-biased description of study outcomes includes a combined stillbirth and live birth/neonatal death outcome. However, because defining the burden of stillbirth and neonatal death is important from a public health perspective, every effort should be made, in low-income countries and elsewhere, to distinguish between stillbirths and live births/neonatal deaths and to report the results independently. (C) 2013 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved
Stillbirths and neonatal mortality as outcomes
Goldenberg, RL., McClure, E., Jobe, AH., Kamath-Rayne, BD., Gravette, MG., & Rubens, CE. (2013). Stillbirths and neonatal mortality as outcomes. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 123(3), 252-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.06.020
To contact an RTI author, request a report, or for additional information about publications by our experts, send us your request.
Multifaceted risk for non-suicidal self-injury only versus suicide attempt in a population-based cohort of adults
Epigenetic biomarkers for smoking cessation
A pilot PT scheme for external assessment of laboratory performance in testing synthetic opioid compounds in urine, plasma, and whole blood