The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted us all as we attempt to stop the virus’ spread while also considering other needs for our health, education, and livelihoods. The global community working to fight neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) is also learning to adapt to these unprecedented times. Through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) Act to End NTDs | East program, we are learning lessons about how to help countries continue progress against NTDs while protecting health workers and communities. To do so, many partners have published new resources to help countries safely restart NTD programs.
Making global NTD guidance local
Year after year, affected countries—backed by a global community committed to ambitious control and elimination goals—have made progress against NTDs. Among the 13 countries in Africa, Asia, and the Americas supported by Act | East, three countries have already eliminated at least one NTD and many are on track to eliminate trachoma and/or lymphatic filariasis by 2030. In April, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended that most NTD activities pause due to COVID-19, suspending—at least temporarily—global progress against these disabling and debilitating diseases.
Initially, our focus was on what NTD program restart “post-COVID” would look like. However, it was quickly recognized that the pandemic would continue for the foreseeable future and we would need to learn how to implement our work safely amidst COVID-19. To aid in this effort, the WHO released guidance to help national NTD programs and their partners assess when activities should resume and what measures should be put in place to reduce the risk of COVID-19 among communities and health workers. WHO guidelines stress the need to take special care of high-risk groups and to apply rigorous social distancing, use face coverings, and frequently wash hands and clean surfaces and equipment.
As leaders of national NTD programs, governments must consider WHO guidance within their unique epidemiological, political, and social context when deciding when to restart. On Act | East, we have been guided by ministries of health on the timing of restart, and we have supported them with planning, assisting as they adapt this guidance to local context and policies. Over and over again, we are struck by the importance of this context-specific approach – which differs both within and among countries. For example:
- some countries have mandatory mask wearing and the population own and regularly use masks, others do not,
- the availability of data on COVID-19 and testing vary,
- the importance of spacing children when lining up for a school-based MDA or survey depends on what their normal day to day practice is,
- where schools are closed, some programs have switched to a community delivery model,
- some communities are more sensitized to COVID-19 than others, impacting the amount of additional communication required, and
- stigma can be associated with outsiders and/or people wearing masks.