CONCLUSIONS:
Given the ethical imperative for treating all patients with dignity, the clinical mandate of finding evidence-based solutions to these mental health challenges, and the legal liability associated with failure to assess and manage violence risk across the treatment continuum, the need for evidence to guide decisionmaking for de-escalating aggressive behavior is critical. The available evidence about relevant strategies is very limited. Only risk assessment decreased subsequent aggression or reduced use of seclusion and restraint (low SOE). Evidence for de-escalating aggressive behavior is even more limited. More research is needed to guide clinicians, administrators, and policymakers on how to best prevent and de-escalate aggressive behavior in acute care settings.
Challenges in conducting EPC reviews of behavior change iInterventions [Internet]
Report No.: 15-EHC029-EF
McPheeters, M., Butler, M., Maglione, M., Viswanathan, M., O'Neil, M., Epstein, R., Anderson Johnson, C., Guise, JM., Gozu, A., Kondo, K., & Chang, C. (2015). Challenges in conducting EPC reviews of behavior change iInterventions [Internet]: Report No.: 15-EHC029-EF. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Methods Research Reports https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK311017/
Abstract
Publications Info
To contact an RTI author, request a report, or for additional information about publications by our experts, send us your request.
Meet the Experts
View All ExpertsRecent Publications
Article
Multifaceted risk for non-suicidal self-injury only versus suicide attempt in a population-based cohort of adults
Article
Development of a novel shared decision making aid for primary immunodeficiency diseases
Article
Community overdose surveillance
Article