Skip to Main Content

RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By and clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.

Accept
RTI International
  • About
    • Office Locations
    • Executive Leadership
    • Corporate Governance
    • Partner with Us
      • U.S. Government
      • Clients and Funding Agencies
      • Industry and Commercial Clients
      • Foundations and Associations
      • Bilateral Agencies and Multilateral Banks
      • Universities and Academic Research Institutions
      • Suppliers and Small Businesses
    • Commitment to Quality
      • RTI's Client Listening Program
    • Ethics and Human Research Protection
    • Living Our Mission
    • Veteran Opportunities at RTI

    About

  • Practice Areas
    • Health
      • Public Health and Well-Being
      • Health Care Transformation
      • Behavioral Health
      • Health Behavior Change
      • Precision Medicine
      • RTI Health Solutions (RTI-HS)
      • RTI Center for Community Health Evaluation and Economics Research
      • Health Equity
      • RTI Health Advance
    • Transformative Research Unit for Equity​
      • Equity Capacity Building Hub
      • Social and Economic Justice Research Collaborative
      • Narrative Research and Community Engagement Lab
    • Education and Workforce Development
      • Early Childhood
      • K-12 Education
      • Postsecondary Education
      • Career and Adult Education and Workforce Development
      • Education Policy, Systems, and Governance
      • Education Research Methodologies
      • Education Technologies
    • International Development
      • Energy for Development
      • Environment
      • Global Food Security, Agriculture, and Nutrition
      • Global Health
      • International Education
      • Monitoring, Evaluation, Research, Learning, and Adapting (MERLA)
      • Youth and Economic Opportunity
      • Building Resilience Against COVID-19 in Developing Countries
      • Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH)
      • RTI Center for Governance
    • Climate Change
      • Clean Energy Technology and Renewables
      • Climate Finance
      • Climate Justice and Equity
      • Climate Planning, Preparedness and Resilience
      • Climate Policy
      • Climate Vulnerability, Adaptation, and Mitigation
      • Economic Impacts of Climate Change
    • Water
      • Food-Energy-Water Nexus
      • Water Quality
      • WASH (Water, Sanitation, Hygiene)
      • Water Resources Management
    • Energy Research
      • Carbon Capture and Utilization
      • Biomass Conversion
      • Natural Gas
      • Energy Efficiency
      • Industrial Water
      • Syngas Processing
    • Environmental Sciences
      • Air Quality
      • RTI Center for Water Resources
      • Urban Sustainability
      • Toxics
      • Building Resiliency in the FEW Nexus
      • Climate Change Sciences and Analysis
      • Environmental Policy
      • Environmental Justice
      • Sustainable Materials & Waste Management Solutions
    • Justice Research and Policy
      • RTI Center for Community Safety and Crime Prevention
      • RTI Center for Policing Research and Investigative Science
      • Child Well-Being and Family Strengthening
      • RTI Center for Forensic Sciences
    • Food Security and Agriculture
      • Market Systems Strengthening
      • Food Safety
      • Food and Nutrition
      • Global Food Security, Agriculture, and Nutrition
      • Climate-Smart Agriculture
      • Agricultural Innovation
      • Obesity Prevention
    • Innovation Ecosystems
      • Innovation Advising
      • Innovation for Economic Growth
      • Innovation for Emerging and Developing Economies
      • Innovation for Organizations
      • Research, Technology, and Innovation Policy
      • Technology Acceleration
    • Military Support
      • Military Behavioral Health
      • Military Health and Human Performance
      • Military Sexual Assault, Harassment, and Domestic Violence Prevention
      • Wearable Sensor Technologies
      • Military Health System Transformation

    Practice Areas

  • Services + Capabilities
    • Surveys and Data Collection
      • Survey Design
      • Instrument Development
      • Survey Methodologies
      • Data Collection
      • Establishment Surveys
      • Health Registries
      • Data Analysis and Reporting
      • Research Operations Center
    • Statistics and Data Science
      • Survey Statistics
      • Environmental Statistics
      • Coordinating Centers for Multisite Studies
      • Analysis and Design of Complex Data
      • Biostatistics
      • RTI Center for Data Science
    • Evaluation, Assessment and Analysis
      • Evaluation Design and Execution
      • Advanced Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods
      • Evaluation, Monitoring, and Assessment
      • Economic Analysis
      • Evaluating Communication Interventions and Campaigns
      • Evidence Synthesis for Policy and Practice
      • Risk Assessment and Prediction
    • Program Design and Implementation
      • Systems Strengthening and Scaling
      • Capacity Assessment and Building
      • Policy Reform Support
      • Curriculum and Teacher Professional Development
      • Interventions and Prevention Programs
      • Implementation Science
    • Digital Solutions for Social Impact
      • Human-Centered Design of Digital Solutions
      • Digital Product Development
      • Digital Communication Campaigns
      • Digital Data Analytics
    • Research Technologies
      • Survey Technologies
      • Data Management and Decision Support Systems
      • Geospatial Science, Technology, and Visualization
      • ICT for Limited-Resource Settings
      • Mobile Applications
      • Web Applications
      • Bioinformatics
      • Interactive Computing
    • Drug Discovery and Development
      • Medicinal Chemistry
      • Molecular Design and Cheminformatics
      • Behavioral Pharmacology
      • Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics (DMPK)
      • In Vitro Pharmacology, Bioassay Development, and High-Throughput Screening (HTS)
      • Isotope Labeling
      • Regulatory Consulting and Support for Medical Products
    • Analytical Laboratory Sciences
      • Bioanalytical and Toxicology Research
      • Forensic Sciences
      • Physicochemical Characterizations
      • Metabolomics
      • Proficiency Testing and Reference Materials
      • Microbiology
      • Analytical Chemistry and Pharmaceutics
    • Engineering & Technology R&D
      • Biomedical Technologies
      • Decarbonization Sciences
      • Environmental Exposure & Protection
      • Materials & Environment
      • Sustainable Energy Solutions

    Services + Capabilities

  • Centers
    • RTI Center for Advanced Methods Development
    • RTI Center for Communication Science
      • Communication Research
      • Communication Design
      • Communication Delivery
    • RTI Center for Data Science
    • RTI Center for Education Services
      • Teaching and Learning
      • Education Leadership
      • Peer Learning Networks
      • Strategic Consulting
    • RTI Center for Forensic Sciences
    • RTI Center for Global Noncommunicable Diseases
      • Program Financing & Economics for NCDs
      • Health Systems Strengthening for NCDs
      • Communication Science and Behavior Change for NCDs
      • Implementation Science for NCDs
    • RTI GenOmics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center
      • Disability Studies
      • Ethics
      • Newborn Screening
    • RTI Center for Water Resources
      • Water Resources Sectors
      • Water Resources Services
      • Water Resources Tools
    • RTI Center for Governance
    • RTI Global Gender Center
    • North Carolina Center for Optimizing Military Performance
    • NCCU-RTI Center for Applied Research in Environmental Sciences
    • RTI Center for Climate Solutions

    Centers

  • Impact
    • Newsroom
    • Insights Blog
    • Events
    • Publications
    • RTI Press
      • About the RTI Press
      • Instructions for Authors
      • RTI Press Collections
    • Projects
    • Global Reach
      • Asia
      • Eastern Europe and Central Asia
      • RTI International India
      • Africa
      • Middle East and North Africa (MENA)
      • Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC)

    Impact

  • Experts
    • Our Experts
    • In-Depth With Our Experts
    • Related News
    • Experts In the Media
    • RTI Fellow Program

    Experts

  • Emerging Issues
    • COVID-19 Research
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Global Health Security
    • Cannabis Research
    • Opioid Research
      • Interventions for Opioid Use Disorders
      • Preventing Opioid Misuse and Overdose
      • Treating Opioid Use Disorders
    • Policing Research and Investigative Science
    • Drone Research and Application
    • E-cigarette Research
    • Zika Virus Research
    • Integrated Governance

    Emerging Issues

  • COVID-19 Research + Response
  • Global Reach
  • Insights Blog
  • Newsroom
  • RTI Press
  • Publications
  • Partner With Us
  • Careers
  • Facebook IconTwitter IconInstagram IconYouTube IconLinkedin Icon
  • Home
  • Impact
  • RTI Press
  • How to launch transdisciplinary research communication

How to launch transdisciplinary research communication

By Kimberly Robasky, Rebecca Boyles, Kira C. Bradford, Margaret Gold, W. Christopher Lenhardt, Shannon McKeen, Sandy Skipper, Stan Ahalt.

April 2020 Open Access Peer Reviewed

DOI: 10.3768/rtipress.2020.rb.0022.2004

Check for Updates Download PDF
Robasky, K., Boyles, R., Bradford, K. C., Gold, M., Lenhardt, W. C., McKeen, S., Skipper, S., & Ahalt, S. (2020). How to launch transdisciplinary research communication. RTI Press. RTI Press Research Brief No. RB-0022-2004 https://doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2020.rb.0022.2004
Copy citation
Share
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Linkedin
  • Email
Key Points
  • Funding large teams of transdisciplinary researchers is essential to the advancement of science, and quickly launching communication channels for these funded scientists is essential to a healthy, rapid start for these activities.
  • Transdisciplinary science communication is fraught with challenge, both during communication set-up and beyond, but these challenges can also be opportunities to institute common-sense practices to promote healthy collaboration behaviors.
  • There are multiple, exhaustive handbooks, detailed templates, and business administration articles offering guidance on the subject of team communications. We have synthesized and summarized that body of knowledge and practice into a brief checklist of tactics for setting up transdisciplinary science. This checklist will benefit research coordinators and stakeholders alike.

Abstract

Transdisciplinary research teams are essential to scientific advancement, and successful transdisciplinary teams rely on effective communication. Overcoming barriers to foster productive team dynamics requires communication strategies and tools. We combine our practical experience to offer a succinct protocol, including only the essentials, to help teams quickly establish an agile communication platform during project start-up (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/N5GFP).

Creative Commons © 2023 RTI International. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Contents

  • Introduction
  • Communication Is Key
  • Methods for Communicating Effectively
    • Define Goals
      • Recognize Team Dynamics
        • Establish Strategies
          • Monitor and Improve
          • Future Transdisciplinary Research Needs: A Protocol
          • Acknowledgments
          • References

          How to Launch Transdisciplinary Research Communication

          By KimberlyRobaskyRebeccaBoylesKira C.BradfordMargaretGoldW. ChristopherLenhardtShannonMcKeenSandySkipperStanAhalt

          Introduction

          Transdisciplinary science—research focused on more than one discipline—is rapidly becoming more prevalent as investigators and funders recognize its benefits.1 By fostering connections among experts and integrating knowledge from broader society, collaborative transdisciplinary teams can achieve results that are simply not attainable by individual or even additive efforts. Large, diverse teams are particularly effective for validation and development of disruptive technology,2 and the most-cited, highest-impact publications and patents are increasingly being produced by such teams.3 Science conducted by a transdisciplinary team (“transdisciplinary team science”) offers great potential for catalyzing breakthrough discoveries and applications, but communicating across institutions, disciplines, and cultures presents unique challenges.

          Key Findings
          • Funding large teams of transdisciplinary researchers is essential to the advancement of science, and quickly launching communication channels for these funded scientists is essential to a healthy, rapid start for these activities.

          • Transdisciplinary science communication is fraught with challenge, both during communication set-up and beyond, but these challenges can also be opportunities to institute common-sense practices to promote healthy collaboration behaviors.

          • There are multiple, exhaustive handbooks, detailed templates, and business administration articles offering guidance on the subject of team communications. We have synthesized and summarized that body of knowledge and practice into a brief checklist of tactics for setting up transdisciplinary science. This checklist will benefit research coordinators and stakeholders alike.

          Here, we offer practical guidelines to the essentials for establishing effective communication strategies for transdisciplinary, multi-institute scientific teams. To translate the guidelines into practice, we introduce a simple, ready-to-use protocol and customizable templates for setting up essential, agile communication practices during project start-up. The protocol itself can be found at https://osf.io/wnb4m/, the instructions for the protocol can be found at https://osf.io/c9j37/, and the project page that contains both the protocol and instructions can be found at https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/N5GFP. These materials are based on approaches that we have applied and tested during our involvement in coordinating centers (CCs)4 and management for projects such as the Biomedical Data Translator5; Data Storage, Toolspace, Access, and analytics for biG-data Empowerment (DataSTAGE, http://bit.ly/2OVC9Ei); the Human BioMolecular Atlas Program (HuBMAP, https://commonfund.nih.gov/hubmap); and citizen science initiatives (http://eu-citizen.science/) (see Table 1).

          Initiatives that informed the protocol
          Initiative Mission Characteristics
          Human BioMolecular Atlas Program (HuBMAP) To facilitate research on single cells within tissues by supporting data generation and technology development to explore the relationship between cellular organization and function, as well as variability in individual cells within normal tissue organization. • Kickoff: 2018
          • 15 funded components
          • 22 principal investigator organizations
          • 189 members
          NIH Biomedical Data Translator To create a data-mining computational resource to improve disease prevention, diagnosis, and treatment by developing a comprehensive, relational, N-dimensional “data translator” that integrates multiple types of existing data sources. • Kickoff: 2016
          • 28 institutions
          • ~200 members
          Data Storage, Toolspace, Access, and analytics for biG-data Empowerment (DataSTAGE) To develop and integrate advanced cyberinfrastructure; leading-edge tools; and findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable (FAIR) data to support the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute research community. • Kickoff: 2018
          • 25 institutions
          • 175 members
          Citizen science projects funded by the European Commission
          (multiple)
          To give citizens a greater role in science to deliver the vision of “science for the people, by the people” for Europe. Projects are funded under a range of programs, most focused on leveraging science for social impact. • Projects typically last 3–4 years
          • Typically 4–8 partner institutions (sometimes more) with 2–3 active team members each
          EU-Citizen.Science Platform for Sharing, Initiating, and Learning Citizen Science in Europe To build an online platform and mutual learning space for sharing useful tools and guidelines, best practice examples, and practical training modules for anyone involved or interested in citizen science. • Kickoff: 2019
          • 14 partners and 9 third parties from 14 member states

          Communication Is Key

          The science of team science is a rapidly emerging interdisciplinary field6,7 that empirically examines the underlying processes of team science and the circumstances that facilitate or hinder its effectiveness.8–10 Successful team science is built on the foundations of collaboration, communication, and trust.11–14

          In addition to the practicalities of organizing a project and conducting research,12,15,16 establishing these foundations requires an appreciation for the role of norms and hidden biases related to power, prestige, rewards, and collegiality. Specifically, each collaborators’ ability to effectively share and implement ideas is crucial, but confounded by multiple, possibly unrecognized factors. For example, although the Internet facilitates remote interaction,17 computer-mediated collaboration is not as effective as collaboration in physically shared environments.18–20 Multi-institutional teams face greater communication challenges and higher coordination costs than smaller, single-institution teams.21 Transdisciplinary science team members may have a range of native languages and differing levels of mastery of the team’s common language. Cultures of people and places also play a role, influencing team members’ approaches to disagreement and attitudes toward hierarchy, responsibility, and autonomy. The many challenges to team transdisciplinary research22 can result in delayed, misinterpreted, or nonexistent communication and impede discovery, trust, productivity, consensus, and division of labor.

          In light of these challenges, it is crucial to nurture a culture of collaboration and a healthy communication climate during project start-up. This requires effective strategies and tools to support burgeoning collaborations and emerging communication channels.

          Methods for Communicating Effectively

          In contrast to teams in the business world, transdisciplinary science team leaders often do not have the option of managed growth, authoritative systems of governance, and explicit collaboration incentives. Typically funded by public grants, major scientific collaborations are often initialized with a large team of contributors and with loosely defined governance. Contributors may or may not have extant trust relationships or aligned motivations and goals; some may even have pre-established competitive relationships. Table 2 summarizes some key challenges of team science efforts, the opportunities arising from those challenges, and good practices for making the most of those opportunities. Team members may be faced with any of these key challenges at any stage.

          Overcoming Common Team Science Challenges
          Challenge Opportunities Practices
          Non-authoritative cross-team governance leading to lack of coherent framing of the problem23 and undefined task dependencies8 Crowd-sourced definition of the problem statement can bring the benefit of many minds Anticipate the emergence and evolution of problems and goals as the project progresses, requiring agile problem-solving. Encourage teams to establish “SMART” goals: Specific, Measurable, Actionable, Realistic and Time-specific24 and identify task dependencies between sub-teams
          Volunteered contributions from highly motivated scientists can result in exceptional intellectual merit Provide an environment to allow self-assembly of diverse (age, gender, race, expertise) 25, cross-functional, well-performing, collaborative sub-teams
          Urgent needs for communication tools to define research and knowledge integration8 and production processes23 in a context with little room for managed growth (e.g., teams are often assembled and already at their optimal size on the first funded day of the project) Rapid implementation of a viable communication platform can facilitate open conversations to quickly establish trust and nurture collaboration Prioritize the establishment of feedback channels that can critique the communication platform’s functionality, accommodating multiple sources and formats for feedback26
          Staff the feedback channels with a combination of humans and technology to allow automated, parallel processing of feedback on the communication platform as it evolves
          Quickly address varying levels of familiarity with the chosen tool biases, accommodating individual preferences wherever possible (“individuals and interactions over processes and tools”27)
          Empower the community to engage in the feedback pipeline at any step of the communication platform implementation
          Aim to release the first version of the communication platform as a minimal viable product rather than as a complete solution
          Consider intentionally reducing the number of communication channels to prevent miscommunication and reduce burden required to stay active on all platforms
          Optimize communication platform release cycles for shortest possible duration
          Keep current all resources on the communication platform (e.g., documents and calendar)
          Establish practices for how to use which communication channels when, and why, especially with respect to where important communication happens; for example, engender “fear of missing out” to encourage the establishment of good tool-usage habits from the outset
          Goal misalignment8 due to fluctuating organization; multiple locations, languages, and working styles (e.g., formal/hierarchical vs. entrepreneurial/lateral); and lack of collaboration incentives8 Team diversity can result in innovative solutions from the cross-pollination of ideas28 Promote transparency to engender trust and the open sharing of ideas; e.g., do leave out budgetary/administrative content, as appropriate, but do not hold invitation-only meetings, which can work at odds with establishing an inclusive culture
          Create a code of conduct that embraces time zone and language differences as well as cultural idiosyncrasies; for example, establish permission to speak bluntly where subtleties may be harder to communicate in a second language
          Design onboarding and training procedures, including the creation of a team glossary, to establish common technical language, culture, and practices
          Provide collaboration incentives, such as recognizing and encouraging open-ended “collaboration projects”
          Facilitate opportunities for live “meet and greet” and cross-team work-product events (hackathons, workshops, other team-building exercises) to explicitly address team differences and create insights on the team’s unique collaboration culture
          Note: Practices are based on the authors’ experience leading or contributing to communication strategies for transdisciplinary science teams.

          In our experience, successful processes for transdisciplinary team communication generally move in an iterative fashion through four stages: (1) defining goals (2), recognizing team dynamics (3), establishing communication strategies, and (4) monitoring and improving practices. These stages are detailed in the sections that follow.

          Define Goals

          Establishing and communicating the vision and goals of the project is essential to successful, on-target outcomes. Developing team and sub-team charters with objectives, deliverables, milestones, roles, responsibilities, and timelines solidifies the vision and clarifies the goals. Recognizing cross-team milestone dependencies and critical paths is an important starting place for overcoming the challenges of transdisciplinary team science. One useful technique is translating the team’s objectives into “SMART” goals—goals that are Specific, Measurable, Actionable, Realistic, and Time-specific.24 Although each team science effort brings unique SMART goals, all teams aim to optimize their production of scientific output. This hinges upon their ability to promote unobstructed, efficient communication and collaboration.

          Recognize Team Dynamics

          Team dynamics strongly influence productivity and output. A common theory in group dynamics is that team development moves through four stages: forming, storming, norming, and performing.29,30 In our experience, these stages can provide useful context to inform approaches to establishing effective team communication.

          The first phase, team formation, should be agile, allowing for fluidity in team membership, leadership, and strategies to the extent possible within the agreed-upon scheme of work and division of tasks. During this phase, communicating the beliefs and values of the team as they relate to the common goal is crucial, as is encouraging members to feel safe in exposing vulnerability to establish trust.31 Trust is also central to the storming phase, in which team members establish their working relationships and processes. “Over-communicating” can be useful at this stage: collaborators should continually provide and receive honest, positive feedback, explain why processes exist, and confirm understanding.

          By the “norming” phase, the team will have settled into a shared language for the project, with a shared glossary for consistent understanding of key terms. At this point, the responsibility for maintaining team strategies and processes can be handed off to a sustaining team. Maintaining focus on the adopted strategies (“staying the course”) helps the team move from storming to norming and performing more quickly. Finally, as the team moves into a performance mode, the sustaining team monitors progress and tweaks processes as the project grows and the team’s needs change. A final stage—adjourning—should also be anticipated throughout the project and when transferring deliverables to outside entities.32

          Although it is ideal to establish communication strategies before the team begins work, this is not always feasible. In many cases, it is necessary to stay agile in responding to complex and sometimes competing needs as the team begins work and evolves over time.

          Establish Strategies

          Generalizable tactics that facilitate effective team science communication include identifying stakeholders, establishing a communication plan, setting up communication infrastructure, responding to feedback and requests, and adhering to “findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable” (FAIR) data principles33 for the project and communication artifacts.

          Stakeholder identification is a critical early activity in any project management exercise.34 In addition to team members, stakeholders may include funders (e.g., grant-making agencies, organizations, or venture capitalists; Congress; consumers), facilitators (e.g., software developers, working groups, collaboration facilitators), and end users, among others.

          Next, it is vital to establish a plan outlining the team’s strategies for internal communication. This plan should describe the target audiences for communication activities; outline the frequency and channels for various types of communication; identify deliverables such as reports or notes; and specify who “owns” the communication and deliverables. A communication plan could also set parameters for meetings, calls, emails, scheduling, the creation and distribution of communication products, and the use of various tools in the communication platform, both within the team and when communicating with other stakeholders.

          A centralized communication platform is one useful way to integrate a team’s internal communication processes. Shared technologies, such as a common website, intranet, or database, have been shown to improve the collaborative activities of a research team.21 However, these technologies are valuable only if they actually improve the frequency and quality of communication. A common approach is to build a central communication platform that consolidates shared tools in an accessible and adaptable way. When selecting tools to include in the platform, it is important to identify potential barriers to adoption, such as complexity and steep learning curves, and to try to minimize them. Practices for using these tools should be outlined in the communication plan. It is important to empower users to drive decisions on the platform tools and features, emphasizing “individuals and interactions over processes and tools.”27

          The ability to receive and respond to stakeholder feedback on the communications strategy and platform is crucial to fostering healthy collaborations. Approaches to soliciting, receiving, and making feedback seem “normal” have been the subject of many business environment analyses.35 These analyses, along with our own experience, underscore the need to encourage feedback in all formats, be responsive, avoid alienating feedback providers, and maintain communication with feedback providers throughout the process of identifying and implementing changes. Feedback providers’ names should be mapped to an actionable change request so they can be contacted with any questions and given updates on the status and timing of changes to address the feedback.

          Finally, it is valuable to apply the FAIR data principles to the communication platform. For example, using communication technology standards and version tracking; announcing updates; broadly documenting processes; and publishing cross-linked, citable documentation can ensure communication artifacts are FAIR33 throughout the project and beyond.

          Monitor and Improve

          Team dynamics and communication requirements evolve as a project progresses and the team grows, shrinks, or matures. In addition to mechanisms for monitoring and control of communication strategy and platform, agility and responsiveness are required to allow for continual improvement. General activities to support monitoring and improvement include the following:

          • Establishing processes for documenting communication tools and updates and training users

          • Defining processes for soliciting, triaging, and responding to feedback

          • Surveying contributors for a baseline on team health9

          • Designing an issue tracking platform to track feedback and important decisions, if project complexity warrants the extra effort

          • Checking in with stakeholders regularly to ensure communication frequency, methods, and target audiences remain valid

          Teams should build in enough flexibility to switch out communication platform tools as needed in response to feedback; embrace designs and processes that allow for iterative cycles of improvement; and, when possible, avoid designs that require early vendor lock-in.

          Future Transdisciplinary Research Needs: A Protocol

          With a thorough understanding of the landscape, goals, strategies, tactics, and monitoring needs relevant to supporting effective communication, a team is well-positioned to establish a healthy communication culture for a new transdisciplinary team science initiative. To translate these guidelines into practical tools, we combined our collective experience in launching large transdisciplinary science initiatives (see Table 1) to create a concise, specific protocol of only the bare essentials for launching communication (http://OSF.IO/N5GFP, https://osf.io/wnb4m/).

          Collectively, our team science efforts faced all of the common communication challenges (see Table 2), and we carefully devised36 a protocol (“CF-1: Transdisciplinary Research Communications Set-up”) that generalizes the methods we found to be most successful in our practice. The protocol is intended as a starting point to adjust as appropriate to meet the needs of each initiative and its scientific goals, team membership, funding parameters, and legal requirements. In contrast to the perspective and context offered here, the CF-1 protocol specifies step-by-step instructions for the practitioner. Team leaders are encouraged to freely download and customize the protocol, leaving only the citation intact. We invite other practitioners to join us in growing this repository with customizable and essential protocols that cover other stages of the project lifecycle.

          As the science of team science evolves, we welcome the community to update the CF-1 protocol, contribute new protocols, and log requests to the main GitHub repository (https://github.com/ResearchSoftwareInstitute/TRTemplates). For the latest version of the published protocol, please visit https://osf.io/wnb4m/.

          Acknowledgments

          The authors thank Anne Frances Johnson, Creative Science Writing, for writing support.

          RTI Press Associate Editor: Brian Southwell

          References

          1Hall KL, editor. Strategies for team science success: Handbook of evidence-based principles for cross-disciplinary science and practical lessons learned from health researchers. Cham (Switzerland): Springer Nature; 2019. 10.1007/978-3-030-20992-6
          2Wu L, Wang D, Evans JA. Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology. Nature 2019;566(7744):378–82. 10.1038/s41586-019-0941-930760923
          3Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 2007;316(5827):1036–9. 10.1126/science.113609917431139
          4Rolland B. Designing and developing coordinating centers as infrastructure to support team science. Strategies for Team Science Success. In: Hall KL, editor. Strategies for team science success: Handbook of evidence-based principles for cross-disciplinary science and practical lessons learned from health researchers. Cham (Switzerland): Springer Nature; 2019. p. 413–7.
          5Biomedical Data Translator Consortium. Toward a universal biomedical data translator. Clin Transl Sci 2019;12(2):86–90. 10.1111/cts.1259130412337
          6Stokols D, Hall KL, Taylor BK, Moser RP. The science of team science: overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. Am J Prev Med 2008;35(2 Suppl):S77–89. 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.00218619407
          7Börner K, Contractor N, Falk-Krzesinski HJ, Fiore SM, Hall KL, Keyton J, Spring B, Stokols D, Trochim W, Uzzi B. A multi-level systems perspective for the science of team science. Sci Translational Med 2010;2(49). 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001399
          8Cooke NJ, Hilton ML. Enhancing the effectiveness of team science. Washington (DC): National Academies Press Washington; 2015.
          9Mâsse LC, Moser RP, Stokols D, Taylor BK, Marcus SE, Morgan GD et al. Measuring collaboration and transdisciplinary integration in team science. Am J Prev Med 2008;35(2 Suppl):S151–60. 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.02018619395
          10Kozlowski SW, Bell BS. Evidence-based principles and strategies for optimizing team functioning and performance in science teams. Strategies for Team Science Success. In: Hall KL, editor. Strategies for team science success: Handbook of evidence-based principles for cross-disciplinary science and practical lessons learned from health researchers. Cham (Switzerland): Springer Nature; 2019. p. 269–93.
          11Bennett LM, Levine-Finley S, Gadlin H. Collaboration & team science: a field guide. Bethesda (MD): NIH National Cancer Institute: NIH National Cancer Institute; 2018.
          12Hall KL, Vogel AL, Crowston K. Comprehensive collaboration plans: practical considerations spanning across individual collaborators to institutional supports. Strategies for Team Science Success. In: Hall KL, editor. Strategies for team science success: Handbook of evidence-based principles for cross-disciplinary science and practical lessons learned from health researchers. Cham (Switzerland): Springer Nature; 2019. p. 587–611.
          13Southwell B, Hedberg AA, Krebs C, Zevitas S. Building and maintaining trust in science: paths forward for innovations by nonprofits and funding organizations. (RTI Press Publication No. CP-0010-1909). Research Triangle Park (NC): RTI Press; 2019. 10.3768/rtipress.2019.cp.0010.1909
          14Fiore SM, Carter DR, Asencio R. Conflict, trust, and cohesion: Examining affective and attitudinal factors in science teams. Team Cohesion 2015;17:271–301.
          15Vogel AL, Hall KL, Fiore SM, Klein JT, Bennett LM, Gadlin H et al. The Team Science Toolkit: enhancing research collaboration through online knowledge sharing. Am J Prev Med 2013;45(6):787–9. 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.09.00124237924
          16Development of a Simplified Consortium Agreement. DESCA 2020 Model Consortium Agreement. 2020. http://www.desca-2020.eu/
          17Olson JS, Olson GM. Working together apart: collaboration over the internet. Synthesis Lect Human-Centered Inform 2013;6(5):1–151. 10.2200/S00542ED1V01Y201310HCI020
          18Gibson CB, Gibbs JL. Unpacking the concept of virtuality: the effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Adm Sci Q 2006;51(3):451–95. 10.2189/asqu.51.3.451
          19Kraut RE, Fussell SR, Brennan SE, Siegel J. Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. In: Hinds P, Kiesler S, editors. Distributed work. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2002. p. 137–62.
          20Serrat O. Managing virtual teams. In: Knowledge Solutions. Singapore: Springer; 2017. p. 619–25.
          21Cummings JN, Kiesler S. Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations. Res Policy 2007;36(10):1620–34. 10.1016/j.respol.2007.09.001
          22Strober MH. Habits of the mind: challenges for multidisciplinary engagement. Soc Epistemology 2006;20(3–4):315–31. 10.1080/02691720600847324
          23Brandt P, Ernst A, Gralla F, Luederitz C, Lang DJ, Newig J et al. A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science. Ecol Econ 2013;92:1–15. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.008
          24Smith PR. Taylor J. Marketing communications: an integrated approach. London (UK): Kogan Page Publishers; 2004.
          25Gomez LE, Bernet P. Diversity improves performance and outcomes. J Natl Med Assoc 2019;111(4):383–92. 10.1016/j.jnma.2019.01.00630765101
          26Buckingham M, Goodall A. The feedback fallacy. Harv Bus Rev 2019;97(2):92.
          27Beck K, Beedle M, Van Bennekum A, Cockburn A, Cunningham W, Fowler M et al. 2001 Manifesto for agile software development. https://agilemanifesto.org
          28Rock D, Grant H. Why diverse teams are smarter. Harv Bus Rev 2016. https://hbr.org/2016/11/why-diverse-teams-are-smarter
          29Bennett LM, Gadlin H. Collaboration and team science: from theory to practice. J Investig Med 2012;60(5):768–75. 10.2310/JIM.0b013e318250871d22525233
          30Tuckman BW. Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychol Bull 1965;63(6):384–99. 10.1037/h002210014314073
          31Coyle D. The culture code: The secrets of highly successful groups. New York (NY): Bantam; 2018.
          32Tuckman BW, Jensen MA. Stages of small-group development revisited. Group Organ Stud 1977;2(4):419–27. 10.1177/105960117700200404
          33Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data 2016;3(1):160018. 10.1038/sdata.2016.1826978244
          34Rose KH. A guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)—fifth edition. Project Management Journal 2013;44(3):e1. 10.1002/pmj.21345
          35Batista E. Make getting feedback less stressful. Harv Bus Rev 2014 Aug. https://hbr.org/2014/08/make-getting-feedback-less-stressful
          36Gough J, Hamrell M. Standard operating procedures (SOPs): how to write them to be effective tools. Drug Inf J 2010;44(4):463–8. 10.1177/009286151004400410

          Click cover to download publication

          Keep Exploring

          • icon-externallink-blue Created with Sketch.

            HTML version [Scholastica]

          Contact

          To contact an author or seek permission to use copyrighted content, contact our editorial team

          • +1 919 541 6490
          • rtipress@rti.org

          Meet the Experts

          View All Experts

          Rebecca Boyles

          Related Publications

          View All Press
          OCCASIONAL PAPER

          Bringing an equity-centered framework to research

          OCCASIONAL PAPER

          The Preschool Entitlement

          OCCASIONAL PAPER

          Culturally informed community engagement

          RESEARCH REPORT

          Substance misuse prevention program attendance

          RESEARCH BRIEF

          COVID-19’s impact on clinical research

          OCCASIONAL PAPER

          Differentiated instruction in multigrade preprimary classrooms in Kenya

          OCCASIONAL PAPER

          Social determinants of health

          OCCASIONAL PAPER

          Challenges facing CAHPS surveys and opportunities for modernization

          Recent Publications

          View All Press
          OCCASIONAL PAPER

          Bringing an equity-centered framework to research

          OCCASIONAL PAPER

          The Preschool Entitlement

          OCCASIONAL PAPER

          Culturally informed community engagement

          RESEARCH REPORT

          Substance misuse prevention program attendance

          RTI Logo
          Partner With Us
          • US Government
          • Commercial
          • Foundations & Associations
          • Multilateral Donors
          • Universities
          • Suppliers
          Site
          • Privacy Policy
          • Security Policy
          • Site Map
          • Terms of Use
          • Accessibility
          • Contact Us
          Contact Us
          Facebook Icon Twitter Icon Instagram Icon YouTube Icon Linkedin Icon
          delivering the promise of science
          for global good
          RTI Health Solutions RTI Innovation Advisors RTI Health Advance

          © 2023 RTI International. RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. RTI and the RTI logo are U.S. registered trademarks of Research Triangle Institute.