RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
What is the best measure for rewarding quality of care
Defect-free vs. composite scoring? An analysis from the American Heart Association's Get With the Guidelines-Coronary Artery Disease (GWTG-CAD) Program
Hernandez, A., Fonarow, G., Dai, D., O'Brien, S., LaBresh, K., Schwamm, L., Cannon, C., & the GWTG Steering Committee, U. (2007). What is the best measure for rewarding quality of care: Defect-free vs. composite scoring? An analysis from the American Heart Association's Get With the Guidelines-Coronary Artery Disease (GWTG-CAD) Program. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 49(9).
RTI shares its evidence-based research - through peer-reviewed publications and media - to ensure that it is accessible for others to build on, in line with our mission and scientific standards.