RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.

Insights

Turning the Tide on Harmful Algal Blooms: The Need for Custom State-Level HAB Models

Algal blooms polluting water. Duck swimming near pollution

What are Harmful Algal Blooms? 

When a bright green film spreads across a familiar lake or reservoir, it's more than an eyesore. It's a far more serious threat to public health and a signal of an environmental challenge. Harmful algal blooms are becoming more frequent and severe as water temperatures rise, and nutrient levels increase. They can lead to contaminated drinking water, threaten fish populations, and disrupt local economies built around recreation and tourism. From a public health perspective, harmful algal blooms can pose serious risks to people who come into contact with the impacted water, causing skin irritation, respiratory issues, or more serious illness if the toxins are ingested.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provides national harmful algal blooms (HAB) forecasts that serve as valuable early indicators of risk. But what if we could deliver HAB forecasts at a more granular level for greater precision, timeliness, and local relevance needed to guide on-the-ground decisions?  

Whether you are looking for a model for a single lake or system of lakes, the time is right to move beyond broad national forecasts and invest in custom HAB models that support more proactive, efficient, and informed water management

One HAB Forecast Doesn't Fit All

The EPA’s HAB forecasts provide an important national snapshot of bloom conditions. They rely on satellite data and standardized models to estimate the likelihood of harmful algal bloom formation and movement across large regions. For awareness and broad-scale planning, these tools are incredibly valuable. 

However, the data may not reflect the specific conditions that drive harmful algal blooms locally, such as the timing and amount of rainfall, lake bathymetry, or wind patterns that concentrate blooms in certain coves or shorelines. 

For state and local teams responsible for protecting water quality and public health, this can pose real challenges. Staff may need to send field teams for sampling without clear prioritization. Risk communication to the public may lag real-tome conditions and mitigation actions from aeration to treatment may come after a bloom has already spread. 

The Case for Custom HAB Forecasting

Custom HAB forecasting brings the focus closer to home. By combining satellite imagery, in-water sensor data, and localized environmental variables, state and local water authorities can build tailored predictive models for harmful algal blooms that better reflect their unique hydrologic and ecological systems. This significantly improves their ability to anticipate and manage bloom events rather than merely responding to them. 

Measurable benefits of custom predictive modeling for harmful algal blooms include: 

  • Stronger public health protection from the ability of recreation manager to issue more advanced warning and advisories
  • Water treatment facilities gain critical time to adopt and adjust treatment processes
  • Timely and coordinated communication between agencies and impacted communities
  • More efficient and targeted fieldwork, reducing already stretched time, budget, and resources
  • Identification of long-term patterns and hot spots to inform future policy, planning and investment decisions
  • Development of proactive mitigation strategies

Building a Custom HAB Framework with Florida Department of Environmental Protection

Developing a localized HAB forecasting program doesn’t require starting from scratch. Many states already collect water quality data, manage in situ sensors, and use GIS tools that can serve as the model’s foundation. 

In our partnership with Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), we were able to create a model that ran each day instead of once each week, ensuring data were as up to date as possible. This allowed the team to be more predictive and proactive in their field-testing approaches. 

To save time and distribute resources effectively, we split larger lakes into smaller zones, so that managers could identify a more specific area to prioritize when allocating sampling teams. For lakes with zones, we could be specific about prioritizing sampling in areas that are near public beaches or drinking water intakes. We were also able to model the movement of a bloom from one area of the lake to another.  

The model developed for Florida also predicted a continuous variable representing harmful algal blooms conditions rather than a binary bloom or no bloom condition like the national EPA model. This allowed water managers to tailor the model to their specific system. 

John Park will be presenting on Operational Forecasting of Harmful Algal Blooms in Florida Lakes Using a Two-Stage Bayesian Model at the American Geophysical Union's (AGU) 2025 Annual Meeting on December 17th. Learn more here

Leading Locally to Respond to the Harmful Algal Blooms Crisis 

As weather patterns continue to shift and intensify, and harmful algal blooms become more frequent, the cost of reactive response grows. Investing in localized forecasting allows states to shift from crisis response to proactive management, protecting public health, conserving resources, and strengthening resilience. 

National HAB forecasts will always play a role in understanding the broader picture. But the greatest impact comes when states take that foundation and make it their own. By tailoring HAB forecasts to local conditions, state agencies can protect their water more effectively and ensure communities have the clean, safe water they depend on. 

Are you a water manager interested in building your own HAB forecasting capabilities? The first step starts with a brief conversation! Together, we can discuss your system, management goals, and data readily available. Contact our team to get started on the development of your own pilot forecasting model.

Key Takeaways

  • Harmful algal blooms (HAB) pose growing risks to public health, aquatic ecosystems, drinking water supplies, and local economies as rising temperatures and nutrient levels drive more frequent and severe blooms.
  • National EPA forecasts provide useful broad-scale awareness, but their satellite-based, standardized approach cannot capture the local conditions—such as rainfall, lake structure, and wind patterns—that drive bloom behavior at individual lakes or shorelines.
  • Custom, localized HAB models offer significant advantages, enabling more precise predictions, targeted fieldwork, earlier public health advisories, better water treatment adjustments, and improved coordination across agencies and communities.
  • State and local teams already have the foundation for tailored models, including water quality data, sensor networks, and GIS tools that can be integrated into a localized forecasting approach.
  • Florida DEP’s custom model demonstrates the value of localized forecasting, providing daily predictions, offering zone-level prioritization, supporting more proactive advisories, improving resource allocation, and enabling the modeling of bloom movement within lakes.
  • Continuous, locally tailored forecasting strengthens resilience, helping states move from reactive crisis response to proactive management that better protects water quality and the communities that rely on it.
Disclaimer: This piece was written by Ciara Pickering (Environmental Engineer), Kimberly Matthews (Senior Manager, Environmental Sciences & Engineering), John Park (Senior Water Resources Engineer), and Natalie Reynolds (Environmental Engineer) to share perspectives on a topic of interest. Expression of opinions within are those of the author or authors.