• Journal Article

The utility of a composite biological endpoint in HIV/STI prevention trials

Citation

Hartwell, T., Pequegnat, W., Moore, J., Parker, C., Strader, L., Green, A. M., ... Klausner, J. D. (2013). The utility of a composite biological endpoint in HIV/STI prevention trials. AIDS and Behavior, 17(9), 2893-2901. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-013-0501-5

Abstract

A human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) as a biological endpoint in HIV prevention trials may not be feasible, so investigators have used surrogate biological outcomes. In a multisite trial, the epidemiology of STIs may be different across sites and preclude using one STI as the outcome. This study explored using a composite STI outcome to address that problem. The combined biological endpoint was the incidence of any of six new STIs (chlamydia, gonorrhea, trichomonas (women only), syphilis, herpes simplex virus type 2 infection and HIV) during a 24-month follow up period. We investigated how a composite STI outcome would perform compared to single and dual STI outcomes under various conditions. We simulated outcomes for four populations that represented a wide range of sex and age distributions, and STI prevalences. The simulations demonstrated that a combined biologic outcome was superior to single and dual STI outcomes in assessing intervention effects in 82 % of the cases. A composite biological outcome was effective in detecting intervention effects and might allow more investigations to incorporate multiple biological outcomes in the assessment of behavioral intervention trials for HIV prevention