RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Using incentivization as a strategy to improve implementation of a motivational interviewing brief intervention for substance use disorders in HIV settings
Results of a 26-site parallel groups cluster-randomized type-3 hybrid trial
Garner, B. R., Tueller, S. J., Bradshaw, M., Speck, K. J., Satre, D. D., Rash, C., Donohoe, T., Mungo, J., Philbrick, S., Ruwala, R., Roosa, M. R., Zehner, M., & Ford, J. H. (2025). Using incentivization as a strategy to improve implementation of a motivational interviewing brief intervention for substance use disorders in HIV settings: Results of a 26-site parallel groups cluster-randomized type-3 hybrid trial . Implementation Research and Practice, 6, 26334895251389475. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895251389475
BACKGROUND: To help improve the implementation of evidence-based substance use disorder (SUD) treatment in practice settings, the United States funds a support system called the Addiction Technology Transfer Center (ATTC) network. Prior implementation research in HIV care found the team-focused Implementation and Sustainment Facilitation (ISF) strategy as an effective addition to the ATTC's staff-focused training, feedback, and consultation (TFC) strategy. Using the ISF + TFC strategy as the control, this type-3 hybrid trial tested the effectiveness of adding a staff-focused incentivization (INC) strategy (ISF + TFC + INC vs. ISF + TFC). Staff-focused incentivization was selected because prior implementation research found it to be highly effective and cost-effective for improving SUD treatment implementation.
METHODS: Twenty-six HIV service organizations (HSOs), their staff participants (N = 87), and their client participants (N = 341) were cluster-randomized to either the ISF + TFC control condition or ISF + TFC + INC experimental condition. The INC strategy rewarded/reinforced motivational interviewing brief intervention (MIBI) implementation (US$10 per MIBI delivered) and MIBI implementation at or above a pre-defined level of quality (US$10 per demonstration). In addition to these outcomes, past 4-week changes/reductions in client participant's days of primary substance use and anxiety symptoms were examined.
RESULTS: The addition of the INC strategy had a large and significant (p < .05) effect on the number of MIBIs implemented (d = 1.30) and reduction in anxiety (d = -1.54). There was no significant impact on days of substance use.
CONCLUSIONS: The addition a staff-focused INC strategy improved implementation of an evidence-based brief intervention for adults with comorbid HIV and SUD, and also reduced anxiety. To help improve the integration of evidence-based SUD services in HSOs across the United States, use of the ISF + TFC + INC strategy by the ATTC network and/or the AIDS Education and Training Center (AETC) network is recommended.
RTI shares its evidence-based research - through peer-reviewed publications and media - to ensure that it is accessible for others to build on, in line with our mission and scientific standards.