RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
US PAYER NEEDS FOR VALUE DEMONSTRATION FOR IGG THERAPIES
Brogan, A., Guptill, JT., Runken, MC., & Hogue, S. (2016). US PAYER NEEDS FOR VALUE DEMONSTRATION FOR IGG THERAPIES. Value in Health, 19(3), A254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.03.1015
Payers are seeking more value-based information; emphasis needs to be on demonstrating value, comparative effectiveness, and cost offsets. Payers generally felt the cost differences in route of administration (SC vs. IV) and site may not be as evident as previously reported. Payers are uncertain of total cost of therapy differences, stating that comparisons between IV and SC need to include acquisition costs and administration fees in a transparent comparison of total therapy costs.