Reporting of Adherence in the VOICE Trial
Mensch, B. S., Brown, E. R., Liu, K., Marrazzo, J., Chirenje, Z. M., Gomez, K., ... van der Straten, A. (2016). Reporting of Adherence in the VOICE Trial: Did Disclosure of Product Nonuse Increase at the Termination Visit? AIDS and Behavior, 20(11), 2654-2661. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-016-1312-2, 10.1007/s10461-016-1312-2
VOICE-a phase 2B, placebo-controlled, randomized trial testing daily use of an antiretroviral tablet (tenofovir or Truvada) or daily use of tenofovir gel in 5029 women from South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe-found none of the drug regimens effective in reducing HIV-1 acquisition in the intent-to-treat analysis. More than half of women assigned to active products in a case cohort sample had no drug detected in any plasma specimens tested during the trial. Yet, in response to questions asked of participants during the trial, aeyen90 % of doses were reportedly taken. To explore factors associated with low adherence, a behavioral termination visit questionnaire was developed after early closure of the oral tenofovir and vaginal gel arms. We hypothesized that participants would be more forthcoming about nonuse after they exited the trial than during monthly/quarterly follow-up visits. Comparison of adherence reporting at routine follow-up visits with reporting at trial termination, however, indicates that disclosure of product nonadherence did not increase at the termination visit as anticipated. In resource-limited settings where women value the ancillary benefits provided by trial participation and are concerned that disclosure of nonuse may jeopardize trial participation, objective measures of adherence may yield more meaningful data regarding the inability or reluctance to use than measures of product use derived from self-report.