RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Pilot study of an interprofessional palliative care curriculum
Course content and participant-reported learning gains
Paganelli, C. R. (2018). Pilot study of an interprofessional palliative care curriculum: Course content and participant-reported learning gains. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049909117725042
Context: The National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care Clinical Practice Guidelines recommend that palliative care clinicians work together as interprofessional teams. We created and piloted a 9-month curriculum that focused on 3 related domains: (1) patient-centered, narrative communication skills; (2) interprofessional team practice; and (3) metrics and systems integration. The multifaceted curriculum was delivered through 16 webinars, 8 online modules, 4 in-person workshops, reflective skill practice, written reflections, and small group online discussions.
Objectives: Report evaluations of the course content and skill self-assessments from 24 interprofessional palliative care clinicians.
Methods: Participants rated each learning activity and completed a retrospective pre-post test skill assessment. Learning gains were measured as the difference in the percentage of participants reporting strong or highly competent skill levels at baseline and the end of the course. Participants also provided examples of how they used the skills in practice.
Results: Participants achieved an average learning gain of 50% across all domains, and in each domain communication (54%), interprofessional team practice (52%), and metrics and systems integration (34%). They also gave high ratings for the curriculum content (overall mean [standard deviation] rating of 5.5 (0.7) out of 6). Examples of practice impacts included improved skills in responding to emotions, understanding the equal importance of all professions on their team and incorporating different perspectives into their practice, and learning about outcome measurement in palliative care.
Conclusion: This curriculum demonstrated success in increasing perceived skills for interprofessional palliative care clinicians in advanced communication, team practice, and metrics and system integration.