RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
The importance of social contact in prison for wellbeing during reintegration
Fahmy, C., Testa, A., & Meyers, T. J. (2026). Physical and mental health upon reentry: The importance of social contact in prison for wellbeing during reintegration. Public Health, 252, 106158. Article 106158. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2026.106158
OBJECTIVES: Incarceration is associated with adverse mental and physical health outcomes that are exacerbated during the post-release period. Social contact with loved ones during imprisonment-such as in-person visits, phone calls, and written correspondence-may play a key role in mitigating the health consequences of incarceration and promoting health upon release. The current study assesses how social contact during incarceration may mitigate health issues during the reentry period.
STUDY DESIGN: The study uses data from a sample of 475 men incarcerated in Texas prisons interviewed prior to release and again one month into the reentry period.
METHODS: Ordered logistic regression models of in-prison social contact types (i.e., in-person visitation, sending/receiving mail, and making/receiving phone calls) and four groups of people (i.e., family members, friends, gang associates, and anyone else) who visited the incarcerated person in the last six months before prison release are utilized to predict self-reported physical health and mental health approximately four weeks post-release.
RESULTS: Mostly consistent with our hypotheses, findings reveal that in-person visitation during incarceration is positively associated with better physical health following release (odds ratio [OR] = 1.61; 95 % Confidence Interval [CI] = [1.05, 2.47]). Additionally, a closer examination of the in-person visitation groups revealed that visits from family members, but not the other three groups (i.e., friends, gang members, or anyone else), were positively associated with better self-reported physical health (OR = 1.88; 95 % CI = [1.28, 2.75]) and mental health (OR = 1.64; 95 % CI = [1.14, 2.37]).
CONCLUSIONS: The results affirm and highlight the unique role of familial relationships in promoting wellbeing during reentry. To promote in-person visitation, correctional systems should consider efforts to overcome key barriers and stressors related to family visits. Identifying individuals who lacked positive visitation experiences could inform targeted wraparound practices that prioritize counseling around family reunification and social connections with loved ones.
RTI shares its evidence-based research - through peer-reviewed publications and media - to ensure that it is accessible for others to build on, in line with our mission and scientific standards.