• Journal Article

A modeling comparison between a two-stage and three-stage cascaded thermoelectric generator

Citation

Kanimba, E., Pearson, M., Sharp, J., Stokes, D., Priya, S., & Tian, Z. (2017). A modeling comparison between a two-stage and three-stage cascaded thermoelectric generator. Journal of Power Sources, 365, 266-272. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.08.091

Abstract

In this work, a comparison between the performance of two- and three-stage cascaded thermoelectric generator (TEG) devices is analyzed based on a prescribed maximum hot side temperature of 973 K, an imposed maximum heat input of 505 W, and a fixed cold side temperature of 473 K. Half-Heusler is used as a thermoelectric (TE) material in the top higher temperature stage and skutterudite as a TE in the bottom lower temperature stage for the two-stage structure. Lead telluride is added in the middle stage to form the three-stage structure. Based on the prescribed constraints, the two-stage cascaded TEG is found to produce a power output of 42 W with an efficiency of 8.3%. The three-stage cascaded TEG produces a power output of 51 W with an efficiency of 10.2%. The three-stage cascaded TEG produces 21% more power than the two-stage does; however, if the system complexity, mechanical robustness, manufacturability, and/or cost of three-stage cascaded TEG outweigh the 21% percent power production increase, the two-stage TEG could be preferable. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.