• Journal Article

Identifying Priorities for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research for Serious Mental Illness

Citation

Jonas, D. E., Mansfield, A., Curtis, P., Gilmore, J. H., Watson, L. C., Brode, S., ... Shetiman, B. (2012). Identifying Priorities for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research for Serious Mental Illness. Psychiatric Services, 63(11), 1125-1130. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100369

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this project was to engage a diverse group of stakeholders (N=38) to help establish priorities to guide patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) in serious mental illness. Methods: Three meetings, two Web-based and one on site, were held to generate and prioritize an initial list of topics. Topics were then sorted and organized into common themes. Results: About 140 topics were identified and sorted into 21 main themes, ranked by priority. Three of the top four themes focused on how research was conducted, particularly the need to develop consensus measurement and outcomes definitions; improving infrastructure for research, longitudinal studies, and new data sets and investigators; and developing PCOR methodology. Stakeholders also identified a need to focus on service delivery, treatment settings, and structure of the delivery of care. Conclusions: Engagement by a broad group of stakeholders in a transparent process resulted in the identification of priority areas for PCOR. Stakeholders clearly indicated a need to fundamentally change how research on serious mental illness is conducted and a critical need for the development of methodology and infrastructure. Most current PCOR has been focused on relatively short-term outcomes, but real world, long-term studies providing guidance for treatment over the lifetime of a serious mental illness are needed. (Psychiatric Services 63:1125-1130, 2012; doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100369)