RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Harlow, B. L., Murray, E. J., & Rothman, K. J. (2020). Genital Powder Use and Ovarian Cancer: (Comment & Response). JAMA, 323(20), 2096. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.3858
To the Editor We disagree with the analysis and interpretation of the findings presented by Dr O’Brien and colleagues.1 The increased risk of ovarian cancer in women with intact genital tracts exposed to powder (HR, 1.13) is actually greater than the estimated 10% increased incidence of ovarian cancer attributable to cumulative talc exposure with 10 000 or more applications previously reported in women with intact genital tracts.2 The lack of association in women without an intact genital tract is consistent with their curtailed exposure. O’Brien and colleagues discounted the results because their statistical test for heterogeneity was not statistically significant. No statistical test is needed to know that women without an intact genital tract face a different risk of ovarian cancer than women whose genital tract is intact.
RTI shares its evidence-based research - through peer-reviewed publications and media - to ensure that it is accessible for others to build on, in line with our mission and scientific standards.