RTI uses cookies to offer you the best experience online. By clicking “accept” on this website, you opt in and you agree to the use of cookies. If you would like to know more about how RTI uses cookies and how to manage them please view our Privacy Policy here. You can “opt out” or change your mind by visiting: http://optout.aboutads.info/. Click “accept” to agree.
Cost-effectiveness analysis of gemtuzumab ozogamicin for first-line treatment of patients with Cd-33 positive acute myeloid leukaemia in Spain
Mareque, M., Montesinos, P., Font, P., Guinea, J. M., de la Fuente, A., Soto, J., Oyagüez, I., Brockbank, J., Iglesias, T., Llinares, J., & Sierra, J. (2021). Cost-effectiveness analysis of gemtuzumab ozogamicin for first-line treatment of patients with Cd-33 positive acute myeloid leukaemia in Spain. ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research, 13, 263-277. https://doi.org/10.2147/ceor.s302097
Objective: To assess the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) + standard of care (SOC) vs SOC alone for treatment of patients with de novo AML from a Spanish Health Service perspective.Methods: A cohort state-transition model, with 12 health-states, was used to estimate the lifetime accumulated cost and benefits in terms of quality-adjusted-life-years (QALYs) in AML patients with favourable, intermediate, and unknown cytogenetic profiles. Patient profile was defined based on the ALFA-0701 trial. Therapeutic regimens were defined by 5 haematologists. SOC was assumed to be idarubicin and cytarabine, the combination most used in Spain. QALYs were estimated by applying utilities for the time spent by the cohort in each health-state and utility decrements associated with adverse events (AE). Total cost ((sic),2020) included drug-acquisition, hematologic stem-cell transplantation, disease management, AE management and end-of-life costs. Unit costs were derived from local databases. All parameters were validated by haematologist. Costs and outcomes were discounted (3%/year).Results: Higher cost/patient ((sic)177,618 vs (sic)151,434) and greater QALYs (5,70 vs 4,62) were obtained with GO+SOC vs SOC. The ICUR was (sic)24,203/QALY gained.Conclusion: This simulation suggests that GO + SOC could be a cost-effective option for treatment of patients with de novo AML in first line.
RTI shares its evidence-based research - through peer-reviewed publications and media - to ensure that it is accessible for others to build on, in line with our mission and scientific standards.