Assessing the robustness of direct meta-analysis in the presence of heterogeneity
Ainsworth, C. (2018). Assessing the robustness of direct meta-analysis in the presence of heterogeneity. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 7(10), 1009-1025. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2018-0024
Abstract
AIM: To assess robustness of findings in recent systematic reviews of atypical antipsychotics in schizophrenia patients in the presence of heterogeneity.
METHODS: Relative efficacy was measured in seven direct comparisons of mean difference (MD) in average positive and negative syndrome scale total score and comparisons between conventional meta-analysis results and four alternate meta-analytic strategies using the difference in MD (ΔMD).
RESULTS: MDs in positive and negative syndrome scale total score were smaller in the conventional meta-analyses than those for three of the four analytic strategies. Such differences were small (all ΔMD <4). No considerable differences in effect size were observed in the limit meta-analysis comparison (|ΔMD| <1).
CONCLUSION: The analyses validated the systematic review results and demonstrate the value of confirmatory sensitivity analysis.
To contact an RTI author, request a report, or for additional information about publications by our experts, send us your request.