Measuring Sexual Victimization: On What Fronts is the Jury Still Out and Do We Need it to Come In?
Krebs, C. (2014). Measuring Sexual Victimization: On What Fronts is the Jury Still Out and Do We Need it to Come In? Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 15(3), 170-180. DOI: 10.1177/1524838014521028
Rennison and Addington use National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) data to document the fact that college women experience violent victimization at a lower rate than women of the same age who do not attend college, which refutes the idea that women in college are at increased risk of being victimized. The measurement of victimization, especially sexual victimization, is, however, a topic that has be the source of much debate. Bureau of Justice Statistics is currently exploring what are the best methods for measuring sexual victimization within the NCVS, and recent methodological research, which is summarized in this article, could inform this process. Although consensus has seemingly been forming around come methods, such as using self-administered survey instruments and behaviorally specific questions when trying to measure sexual victimization, the jury is still out on some other design fronts. What is not clear is whether we need the jury to come in, so to speak. Some methodological variation might be acceptable, especially if the various methods being considered are producing similar results